Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care ; 2022(6) (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2257906

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Since 2019, it has spread all over the globe, causing a pandemic that is still ongoing. COVID-19 vaccines protect against this disease through different strategies. Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm vaccines were the most used vaccines in Iraq. Both vaccines have a specific mechanism to trigger the immune system in cells. This research aims to compare the biochemical and immunological responses in vaccinated individuals with either the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine or the Sinopharm vaccine. This cohort study included 120 Iraqi adults vaccinated with two doses, 21 days apart, using either the Pfizer or the Sinopharm vaccine. Forty subjects received the Pfizer vaccine, 40 subjects received the Sinopharm vaccine, and the other 40 subjects were unvaccinated. After 6 weeks, the second dose was administered, and the blood samples were collected. Our findings revealed that the biochemical biomarkers, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase, seem to be not affected by the vaccines used. However, both vaccines significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase levels (p < 0.05). In contrast, the immunological biomarkers such as IgG, IgM, C3, IL-2, and hs-CRP remarkably responded to both vaccines (p < 0.01), while procalcitonin levels were significantly increased by the Pfizer vaccine (p < 0.05). The study concluded that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine boosted the immune system more than the Sinopharm vaccine. A booster dose is advised for people who have already taken Sinopharm or have long-term immunosuppressive diseases.Copyright © 2022 Edan, Khalaf, Geeran, licensee HBKU Press.

2.
Molecules ; 28(5)2023 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2254456

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has flared across every part of the globe and affected populations from different age groups differently. People aged from 40 to 80 years or older are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19. Therefore, there is an urgent requirement to develop therapeutics to decrease the risk of the disease in the aged population. Over the last few years, several prodrugs have demonstrated significant anti-SARS-CoV-2 effects in in vitro assays, animal models, and medical practice. Prodrugs are used to enhance drug delivery by improving pharmacokinetic parameters, decreasing toxicity, and attaining site specificity. This article discusses recently explored prodrugs such as remdesivir, molnupiravir, favipiravir, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and their implications in the aged population, as well as investigating recent clinical trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Prodrugs , Animals , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Phosphorylation , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Radiology of Infectious Diseases ; 9(3):79-85, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2202112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Research has shown that older people and smokers have a higher death probability from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, we investigated the effect of COVID-19 on death probability for individuals aged 65–70 years and smokers in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did so using a differential learning (feed-backward) model. In the present study, we examined World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 data of India. We divided the patients into two groups accordingly: the population aged 65–70 years and female or male smokers. RESULTS: We observed that in the early stages of infection (up to 5 days), there was higher death probability in the older population;among smokers, it occurred in the middle period after infection (5–8 days). We estimated that the death probability among smokers was 1.905 times that of the older population. CONCLUSION: As Government of India, taking various initiatives to curb the spread of COVID-19, but these are not enough, so we suggest measures that should help to reduce COVID-19 infection in India.

4.
Kobe J Med Sci ; 68(1): E23-E29, 2022 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2168756

ABSTRACT

Sleep is important for the well-being of school-aged children. Almost all schools in Hyogo prefecture in Japan were closed from April 7 to May 31, 2020, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The pandemic restrictions resulted in the disruption of the sleep routines of children. The number of children who experienced sleepiness in class after school closure increased. The number of children who visited our hospital 1 year before and after the closure was 208 (11.73 ± 3.24 years of age) and 155 (11.45 ± 3.30 years), respectively. The number of chief complaints of sleep-related symptoms at the first visits showed no significant difference between the two time periods. The percentage of patients who slept during class increased (but not significantly) after the school closure. However, the mean number and duration of sleep episodes during class significantly increased from 0.31 ± 0.76 to 1.04 ± 1.14 episodes/day and from 15.8 ± 38.6 to 45.7 ± 46.9 min/day (each P < 0.001) before and after school closure, respectively. The total number of patients in our hospital with the primary central disorders of hypersomnolence, i.e., narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia, and Kleine-Levin syndrome, and the number of patients with insufficient sleep syndrome after the school closure significantly increased compared with those before closure (P = 0.034 and 0.048, respectively). School closure was associated with an increased incidence of sleeping during class; therefore, maintaining a stable daily routine for children with sleep disorders could have an alleviating effect.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Kleine-Levin Syndrome , Narcolepsy , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sleep , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Narcolepsy/diagnosis , Kleine-Levin Syndrome/diagnosis
5.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(18)2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2032929

ABSTRACT

The general population, but especially older adults, were forced or encouraged to stay home during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, indoor mobility (IM, the number of steps performed daily at home) may be informative about the general health status of older adults. The present study aimed at evaluating the relationship between IM, frailty (loss of functional reserve including both physical and psychosocial domains), and disability (loss of autonomy measured as activities of daily life, ADLs) in a sample of community-dwelling Italian older adults. Specifically, the primary objective was to investigate IM and disability differences between robust and frail older adults. The secondary objective was to test if frailty is in the causal sequence between IM and disability, i.e., as a mediator in their relationship. Thirty-two participants (mean age = 70 ± 6 years; 56.2% women) were recruited. Frailty and disability were evaluated using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale, respectively. IM at home was measured via an Adamo wristwatch (a connected accelerometer). One-way analyses of covariance, controlling for age and gender, showed that robust participants, classified according to a score higher than five points in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator, performed significantly more IM (F1,28 = 4.639; p = 0.04) and presented lower disability grade than frail ones (F1,28 = 4.342; p =0.046). Only physical frailty was a mediator in the relationship between IM and disability (F2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001), with a fully mediated model (z = -2.073, p < 0.04). Conversely, the total frailty score was not a mediator in the same relationship, but with IM accounted for the variance in disability (F2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001; R2 = 33.7%). Our results suggested that frail older adults restricted their IM more and presented a higher level of disability compared to robust older adults. Moreover, data suggest that IM reduction may have a negative impact on physical frailty and indirectly increase disability.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Frail Elderly/psychology , Frailty/complications , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Independent Living , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics
6.
Digital Methods and Tools to Support Healthy Ageing ; : 97-124, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1960529

ABSTRACT

More than 15.9% of Australia’s population is aged 65 years or above as of 2019 and this group is projected to increase more rapidly over the next decade. Over the last few years, there has been an active push by healthcare providers to have patient health data and records uploaded online for better and faster healthcare services. Due to Covid-19, many health service providers are taking their patients’ records to online platforms. Even though accessing these online health records has become much easier and more cost-effective than working with physical documents, there has been increased awareness and concerns regarding health data privacy. In this chapter, we will look at the Australian health data privacy and how it is applicable to online health data of the aged population. © The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2021.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL